Thus, it may prove difficult to explain and justify ordinary moral sentiments according to which the scope of moral responsibility for causing an outcome is presumptively determined and delimited by the boundaries of reasonable foreseeability. But the intuitive moral phenomenon here is a perfectly general one. It has nothing in particular to do with relational wrongdoing (or the infringement of rights against injury, for that matter). After all, outcome foreseeability seems equally to limit moral responsibility for damaging objects of impersonal value — in precisely the same, reflectively mysterious way.361 Here, as elsewhere, some of the most interesting and difficult philosophical questions about tort law come into clear view only if we look beneath the formal surface of the doctrine and its ostensible concern for relational duties and wrongs.
obligation. These were not decorative sensibilities. They were the insights。safew 官网入口对此有专业解读
。关于这个话题，谷歌提供了深入分析
https://feedx.net
class SparseBox3DRefinementModule(BaseModule):，这一点在游戏中心中也有详细论述